Sections
Poll: Current Poll
Login
Did you enjoy this article?
Cheating College Students
CHEATING COLLEGE STUDENTS
By Cal Thomas
Tribune Media Services
"If you can read this, thank a teacher," says the bumper sticker on the
car in front of me. But literacy is more than the ability to read a
bumper sticker. It also includes the accumulation of basic knowledge
combined with a way of thinking that allows an individual to lead a life
that is personally productive and contributes to America's health and
welfare.
For the second year in a row, America's elite universities and colleges
have failed to rise above a "D plus" on tests of basic knowledge about
civics and American history, maintains a study commissioned by the
Intercollegiate Studies Institute's (ISI). In 2005, ISI contracted with
the University of Connecticut's Department of Public Policy (UConnDPP)
to administer tests of basic historical and civic knowledge to 14,000
students at 50 top schools, including Yale, Harvard, Cornell, the
University of Virginia, Brown and Duke. The survey found that students
"were no better off than when they arrived in terms of acquiring the
knowledge necessary for informed engagement in a democratic republic and
global economy." Since an education at top colleges can cost as much as
$40,000 a year, it would appear that those paying the bill are being
cheated.
ISI's final report entitled "The Coming Crisis in Citizenship: Higher
Education's Failure to Teach America's History and Institutions,"
presented four pivotal findings:
1. The average college senior knows very little about America's history,
government, international relations and market economy. Their average
score on the civic literacy test was 53.2 percent. "No class of seniors
scored higher than 69 percent, or D plus."
2. Prestige doesn't pay off. "An Ivy League education contributes
nothing to a student's civic learning. ... There is no relationship
between the cost of attending college and the mastery of America's
history, politics, and economy."
3. Students don't learn what colleges don't teach. "Schools where
students took or were required to take more courses related to America's
history and institutions," says the ISI, "outperformed those schools
where fewer courses were completed. The absence of required courses in
American history, political science, philosophy and economics suggests a
negative impact on students' civic literacy."
America's most prestigious colleges had the worst scores. Many of the
schools that typically rank the highest in popularity score among the
lowest in advancing civic knowledge. Generally, the ISI study found, the
higher the ranking by U.S. News and World Report in its annual survey of
institutions of higher education, the lower the rank in civic learning.
"Even when controlling for numerous variables that influence learning,
seniors at schools with reasonably strong core curricula - for example,
Rhodes, Calvin and Wheaton - had double the gain in civic learning
compared with those seniors at schools without a coherent core
curriculum - for example, Brown, Cornell and Stanford."
4. Greater civic learning goes hand-in-hand with more active
citizenship. "Students who demonstrated greater learning of America's
history and its institutions were more engaged in citizenship activities
such as voting, volunteer community service and political campaigns."
The study found that "86 percent of the students at the four
highest-ranked colleges had exercised their right to vote at least once.
At Colorado State, ranked second overall, 90 percent of seniors had
voted at least once. ... Higher civic learning and greater civic
involvement are closely associated."
Here are three of the test questions. Even partially informed people who
believe American history is a better teacher than fascination and
fixation on the latest news about Britney Spears and O.J. Simpson ought
to be able to answer them correctly. The entire 60 multiple-choice
questions can be found on ISI's Web site, www.isi.org.
1. Which battle brought the American Revolution to an end: (a) Saratoga
(b) Gettysburg (c) the Alamo (d) Yorktown (e) New Orleans?
2. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (1964) was significant because it: (a)
ended the war in Korea (b) Gave President Johnson the authority to
expand the scope of the Vietnam War (c) Was an attempt to take foreign
policy power away from the president (d) Allowed China to become a
member of the United Nations (e) Allowed for oil exploration in
Southeast Asia.
3. Which of the following is the best measure of production or output of
an economy (a) Gross Domestic Product (b) Consumer Price Index (c)
Unemployment rate (d) Prime Rate (e) Exchange rate?
Everyone should take the test. No cheating and no, I'm not going to give
you the answers. If you're interested enough to read this column, you
ought to be smart enough to know them. If not, then you paid too much
college tuition, or didn't take college seriously enough to get a real
education.
In 1777, John Adams wrote to his son about the importance of education.
He said it was necessary to teach the next generation about America's
founding principles in order to preserve the freedom and independence so
many of his fellow countrymen sacrificed to achieve. Only when we know
and embrace those principles can we pass on to a new generation that
which we inherited from the past. The ISI study reveals severe cracks in
that foundation, which need immediate attention and repair.
(Direct all MAIL for Cal Thomas to: Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore
Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, N.Y. 14207. Readers may also e-mail Cal Thomas
(c) 2007 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Post your comment
Comments (3 posted)
-
Posted by romanov, September 21, 2007 9:57:12I have a history degree from an Ivy League school. In the course of getting that degree I learned that when you are presented with information you need to not only analyze the argument presented, but the bias and context of whoever is informing you. Even the most trustworthy sources view the world through the lens of their time and their cultural prejudices, and a competent historian will attempt to separate what is actually true from what the source believes to be true. When I came across this article I decided to apply what I had learned. First, I tried to discover if the source had any biases beyond those we all share simply by being alive at this time. A quick look at their web site (www.isi.org) shows that it is a conservative think tank. It has reading lists of conservative authors, a book store that features conservative texts, and sponsors speeches from conservative pundits, including a recent one from a National Review contributor. The ISI also has a mission of outreach to college students, with a stated intention to encourage the brightest students to adopt their views. With these biases in mind I looked at the evidence presented. First, I took the test that the report is based on. (http://www.americancivicliteracy.org/resources/quiz.aspx) While some of the questions are substantial, a good number could be considered trivia and a handful are ideologically motivated. (Score: 55/60- 91% ;) ) Given the biases of the organization, this raises a question: Is the test is designed to deliberately produce low scores? A low score would indicate that the mission of the ISI has not been achieved, and that the ISI deserves further funding to address the problem. Then I looked at the conculsions quoted in the article and tried to think about them in light of the biases I had discovered and the facts listed in the survey results. It seemed that the conclusions drawn from the report were influenced to an unusual degree by what the authors wanted to be true. For instance, the statement "prestige doesn't pay off" seeks to indicate that Ivy League schools are no better than other schools. But in fact, the report compares the cost of schools to test results. Since many private schools not in the Ivy League cost as much or nearly as much as the more prestigious institutions, this seems very misleading. In fact, the data listed on their own website (http://www.americancivicliteracy.org/report/tables.html) shows that of the fifty schools surveyed, the lowest ranking Ivy was Cornell at #19, followed by Princeton at #11 and UPenn at #8. Brown, Yale, and Harvard are all in the top 5, with Harvard being number one. Every Ivy was in the top half of the sample. There clearly does seem to be a relationship between the academic reputation of the school and the test results. The ISI seems to by trying to mislead readers by comparing tuition cost to scores instead of academic ranking to scores, perhaps because the Ivy League schools are not generally friendly to the conservative agenda they represent. In fact, the failure of the Ivy League is a main point of the report. One conclusion says "America’s most prestigious colleges had the worst scores." But as I just stated, that's actually not the case - they actually had among the best scores. The conclusion goes on to clarify that other schools posted "double the gain" from freshman to senior year test scores. But looking at the data on the web site, it's clear that the schools that had large gains in test scores, like #1 Eastern Connecticut State University (31 to 40%) still had less knowledgeable seniors than the elite universities with small or even negative gains, like #50 Cornell (61 to 56%). In other words, kids at the Ivy League started out smart and stayed that way. Kids at lower ranked schools started out lower and improved, although never to the level of the Ivies. This should be good news. Even by the standards of this imperfect test, it seems as if a meritocracy is alive and well, that smart kids get into good schools, and that every college student gains civic knowledge over the course of four years. Yet ISI concluded the opposite. Perhaps if they had one of the Ivy League educations they deride, and that some of us worked and saved so hard to obtain, they could have done a better job.
-
Posted by annimous, September 20, 2007 9:09:00I have to disagree with Mr. Thomas. Though I agree that it is shameful that these students did so poorly, it is not the mission of universities and colleges to teach civics or American history. This is information that students should have learned in high school or even junior high school. All citizens should be able to answer these questions--not just college seniors. Yes, the educational system has failed, but it is not a failure of higher education.






Columns


