Sections
Poll: Current Poll
Login
Did you enjoy this article?
LOST IN POLITICAL SPACE
LOST IN POLITICAL SPACE
Tribune Media Services
Sen. John McCain’s daughter and his presidential campaign manager think they’ve figured out why McCain lost the 2008 election and what Republicans must do to win in the future. They need to be more like Democrats.
Steve Schmidt and Meghan McCain delivered their analyses in separate speeches to the Log Cabin Republicans, whose stated mission “is to work within the Republican Party to advocate equal rights for all Americans, including gays and lesbians.” Schmidt thinks he has some special insight because his sister is a lesbian.
Schmidt told the group he believes that a political party should not take or argue a position on same-sex marriage based on religious grounds. “If you put public policy to a religious test,” he said, “you risk becoming a religious party, and in a free country, a political party cannot remain viable in the long term if it is seen as sectarian.” Meghan McCain claimed, “Too many Republicans want to cling to past successes. There are those who think we can win the White House and Congress back by being ‘more’ conservative. Worse, there are those who think we can win by changing nothing at all about what our party has become.”
In his remarks, Schmidt tried to engage in moral acrobatics, asserting that a pro-life position, which Sen. McCain promotes, ought to translate into support for same-sex marriage: “The argument of the pro-life community acquires its moral force because it holds that the life of the unborn is not distinct in its dignity from the life of the born, and, thus, possesses a God-given right to be protected.”
That argument could easily be turned around. If God gives rights to the unborn, doesn’t He also get credit for defining marriage as between a man and a woman? The comment from the preacher at my wedding (and many other weddings in the “old days”) seems relevant: “What God has joined together, let no man put asunder.”
Republicans are in electoral trouble for many reasons, but one of them surely is not that they are insufficiently liberal on social issues. What’s the point of having a two-party system if one party mimics the other? Many erstwhile Republican voters turned on the GOP not because they were insufficiently liberal, but because they were conservative-lite.
Schmidt and McCain could not begin to count the number of votes that would be lost were the party to abandon social conservatives and their issues. Whatever minimal gains might be made from younger, more progressive Republicans will be more than offset by older (and younger) social conservatives who will abandon the party and either stay home in disgust on Election Day, or vote for third-party candidates. Either scenario will bring the same result: the election of more liberal Democrats. Besides, there is much support among the electorate for maintaining opposite-sex marriage, as demonstrated by numerous ballot initiatives in regions outside the South.
Meghan McCain said Republicans needed to look forward, be more modern, forget the past (presumably she means those Reagan and Republican congressional victories) and adopt new beliefs. Why not forget the Founders while we’re at it? Aren’t they just dead white men, after all? McCain’s perfect candidate was on the “Today” show last Tuesday. Carlie Beck, a California high school cheerleading coach, was fired after she posed nude for Playboy. In an interview, Beck said she thinks everyone should make up his or her own morals. That “philosophy” is perfect for the GOP of McCain and Schmidt. It’s beyond the “if it feels good, do it” code of the ’60s. It’s morphed into, “if it will get you elected, embrace it.”
Dissing the past is a quality found mostly in arrogant youth who think they know more than anyone who has ever lived and believe only they are sufficiently enlightened enough to tell the rest of us how and what to think. But the past and those who have gone before are great teachers for moderns who would learn. The writer of Ecclesiastes noted that there is “nothing new under the sun.” And there’s also this, “Is there any thing whereof it may be said, ‘See, this is new’? It hath been already of old time, which was before us.”
Republicans can take old ideas that once brought them victory and repackage them for a new generation. It was through embracing what has worked — economically, politically and morally — that has sustained America through many challenges. While a moral reformation cannot come through government, moral deterioration will advance with greater speed if political leadership does not remind the country of unchanging principles.
What shall it profit a party if it gains electoral victory, but loses its political soul?
(Direct all MAIL for Cal Thomas to: Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Suite 114, Buffalo, N.Y. 14207. Readers may also e-mail Cal Thomas at tmseditors@tribune.com.
(C) 2009 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Post your comment
Comments (3 posted)
-
Posted by TryLogic, April 28, 2009 1:40:50These discussions are always a little tiresome. Our forefathers gave us the foundation for government that respects our individual rights and the freedom to choose our personal beliefs. They did not form a Chistian nation as many conservatives claim, but protected us from that. Our political issue should be about comparing the positive effects of freedom, liberal democracy and capitlism with the destructive effects of socialism and oppressive government. Religious opinions about alternative lifestyle and abortion won't have any serious meaning in time if we can't come together and choose the best form of government for all individuals that cherish freedom. Moral stands on issues can only happen in a free society. Whether you are pro or anti alternative lifestyles ....pro or anti abortion....we are all better off in a free country....and that concept is what Republicans should promote. There are 10,000 religions and not one of them can show any clear evidence that it is the true path to a god. So conservatives should stand together and thank each other for the freedom to believe.....even if what we believe could be wrong! TryLogic
-
Posted by FredCFO, April 25, 2009 3:47:59WHY I\'M MAD AT THE REPUBLICANS The doubling of the deficit from 2001 to 2008. This country went from a deficit of .6 Trillion to Trillion in eight years. Bush’s tax cuts were a good idea in 2001 and 2002. We avoided a recession; however, they should have been rescinded in 2003 after the recession was over. According to Keynesian Economics – the government deficit spends during a recession and runs surpluses during the boom. (Although Milton Friedman said, “There is nothing more permanent than a temporary government program”.) The Iraqi War. The war was started on the flimsiest of excuses – an allegation of “yellow cake” being purchased by Saddam Hussein in Nigeria. (This is not unlike the Gulf of Tonkin incident that triggered the expansion of the Viet Nam War.) It was justified by the 1% Doctrine – if there is a one percent chance that WMD’s were in Iraq then war wasn’t optional, it was necessary. Secondly, war was waged, but it was not paid for. We did not raise taxes, they were cut instead. Tax cuts. How can we have tax cuts? We have already been taxed by deficit spending, we just haven’t paid them yet. As Milton Friedman once noted, "Deficits are just a poor way of taxing". Republican Congress Majority Style (2001 to 2006 ). The party of the Contract with America, smaller government and fiscal responsibility became the Democratic Party II – spend, spend, spend. The Republican Congress spent it and Bush didn’t veto anything his fellow Republicans cooked up. Republican Congress Minority Style (2006-?) Oh, now the budget spends too much, borrows too much and taxes too much. Where the hell were these guys from 2001 to 2006? Now the Republicans are the voice of fiscal responsibility? What happened to the Republican Congresses of 1995, 1997 and 1999? Presidential Candidates. Where are the Presidential Candidates? Why do we get the Bob Doles and the John McCains (and in retrospect W)? Outside of Eisenhower and Reagan, we got Nixon, Ford, HW Bush, Dole, W Bush and McCain. We have met the enemy and them is us.
-
Posted by BGfan, April 25, 2009 2:26:25I don't think a Barry Goldwater would ever have embraced the religious tones of today's Republican party. He never would have made abortion or same sex marriage the big issues they are today. He never would have embraced invading other countries preemptively. If experience and tenure of today's crowd of operatives has derailed the republican ideology as much as it has from what a Taft or Goldwater stood for, then I don't think criticizing Republican youth for arrogance is the proper tactic. That 'youth' just may be more correct than the 'experienced'. The republican party had already lost its Goldwater/Taft soul even before Bush I. It only walked on in a zombie state during Bush II.






Columns


